Washington / Nashville - This is a case that long ago transcended legal questions - it has become a symbol for how a government deals with law, truth, and human life. Construction worker Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador and brought back to U.S. soil in a high-profile return, now stands trial - accused by a man whose own record is riddled with contradictions. According to court documents, the Trump administration has decided to spare 38-year-old Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes from deportation - in exchange for his cooperation against Abrego Garcia. Hernandez himself has been convicted of human smuggling and illegal reentry, and also pleaded guilty to "deadly conduct" in Texas - where he drunkenly fired a gun in public. According to the documents, he was released early from prison and transferred to a halfway house. He has been granted permission to remain in the U.S. for at least one year. Why this mercy? He is the “first key witness” in the case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, as stated in the records obtained by the Washington Post. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Hernandez was the owner of the SUV allegedly used by Garcia in 2022 to transport migrants - a charge based on a traffic stop by the Tennessee Highway Patrol. That stop is the central point of the entire prosecution.
But what looks like a solid witness strategy on paper is, in truth, raising more and more questions - especially about the government’s own conduct. While the key witness is protected from deportation, the court continues to wrestle with the question of whether the Justice Department can be trusted at all. On Friday, Garcia’s attorneys formally requested that the defendant remain in custody - ironically, because the government’s statements about the possibility of another deportation can no longer be trusted. The attorneys put it bluntly: “We cannot put any faith in any representation made by the government on this issue.” Recently, it had seemed that Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville was prepared to release Garcia so he could await trial on the alleged smuggling charges. But in light of the conflicting statements from Washington, she remains hesitant. The concern is too great that ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) might seize him again before the trial begins - a repeat of the constitutional violation in March, when Garcia was deported to El Salvador despite court orders.
ilmar Abrego Garcia, who had lived and worked as a construction laborer in Maryland, became a symbol of the authoritarian course of Trump’s second term after his deportation. His case mobilized civil rights groups, senators, UN officials, and the international press. Only under massive pressure - and after a ruling by the Supreme Court - was he brought back to the U.S. in mid-June. Since then, it has become clear: the charges against him rest on extremely shaky ground. His attorneys call the indictment “preposterous” - absurd, grotesque. And many observers are now asking: What is the testimony of a repeatedly convicted man worth, especially one who avoids deportation by cooperating? What does it mean for the rule of law when credibility is traded for clemency - in a case that could determine the fate of an innocent man? Outside the federal courthouse in Nashville, a woman stands holding a portrait of Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Katheryn Millwee, activist, supporter, witness to a legal drama that also exposes the United States from within. Because the real question is no longer whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia is guilty or innocent - but whether the institutions of this government are still willing and able to administer justice. Garcia has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues. But the shadow it casts stretches far beyond Nashville - deep into the heart of American democracy.
English 
German 
