Research Exposed Government Lies - Decision on Child Deportation Expected Tomorrow

A federal judge in Washington has once again halted the deportation of dozens of Guatemalan migrant children - and in doing so has restrained a government that had already been forced to revise its own claims. Timothy J. Kelly, judge at the U.S. District Court, declared that the children may not be deported until Thursday at 11:59 p.m. It was the same reason as the week before, he said: he needed time to examine the legal questions that reach deep into the foundation of American rule of law. The extension of this judicial moratorium came at a moment when the government itself had to admit that essential parts of its previous account were not true - after both research findings and sworn statements were presented to the court today. Only a few days earlier it had claimed that the parents of the affected children had requested their return to Guatemala. Now, however, it is proven: the opposite is the case. The parents are fighting desperately to protect their children from violence, poverty and hopelessness - and not to send them back into the very conditions from which they fled.

The case has its roots in a controversial operation over the Labor Day weekend, when the Trump administration attempted to fly several dozen unaccompanied children back to Guatemala. Many of them spent hours on the tarmac while their fate was being negotiated - an image whose coldness was shocking even for American immigration policy, accustomed as it is to harshness. See our article at: https://kaizen-blog.org/en/wieder-ein-kleiner-erfolg-gericht-stoppt-abschiebung-von-guatemaltekischen-kindern/

The judge's decision came on the very day when Congress received a whistleblower document that once again starkly underscored the moral gravity of the situation. At least 30 of the children slated for return have demonstrably suffered abuse - from death threats to gang assaults to human trafficking. That the government nonetheless pushed ahead with their deportation raises not only legal but also profoundly ethical questions.

It is this contrast between the bureaucratic language of government memoranda and the existential cries of children that makes the full drama of the moment visible. On the one hand a bureaucracy trying to let numbers and file notes speak; on the other hand accounts of violence that no child should endure. Judge Kelly has once again stood against the haste of the executive - and has given the country a breathing space. A breathing space that is not only legally necessary but morally imperative. That in the midst of all this children are being reduced to pawns in a political show of force is the true scandal. In the sober lines of the judicial order there resonates something of significance far beyond Washington: the reminder that law cannot be enforced at breakneck speed when human lives are at stake. And that the most defenseless - in this case the children - deserve the strongest protection. Whether this breathing space will be enough to usher in a departure from a policy of harshness remains uncertain. What is certain is only this: the time Judge Kelly is taking is more than legal thoroughness. It is a quiet protest against the reduction of children to file numbers - and a call not to lose humanity in the crush of political power plays.