t was the day after the rain, and the rain was no longer rain but memory. Memory of the roar of the water that swallowed houses, tore open roads, swept away lives. And on that day, when the sky finally fell silent, America called for help. But no one answered. No signal, no callback, only the circling of a hold tone in the ear. The catastrophe had not receded - it had merely changed channels: from the flood outside to the silence on the line. On July 6, 2025, 2,363 people in Texas dialed the number for FEMA - the federal disaster relief agency. 846 of them got through. That’s 35.8 percent. The others were not heard. And this in a week when the water claimed over 120 lives, including many children, when towns were buried under rubble, and the air vibrated with the hope for a simple sentence: "We’re coming." But no one came. Because the government had decided not to decide. On the night of July 6, exactly one day after the peak of the flood, the contracts of the call center employees who were supposed to answer emergency calls around the clock expired. Hundreds of them were let go. Not because the water receded - but because the budget stopped. Because Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had recently introduced a rule requiring her personal approval for all expenditures over $100,000. That included emergency contracts. But Noem didn’t sign. Not for five days. On July 7, 16,234 calls came in to FEMA. Over 84 percent went unanswered. At that point, it wasn’t just political failure - it was political intent. Internal emails were already circulating: "We still have no decision, no order, no signature." The sentence is dated July 8. And it stands in a country that has pledged itself to efficiency, like a monument to a new cold order: those who suffer must wait. And those who wait, wait alone.
Only on July 10, when CNN reported that even the deployment of search and rescue teams had been delayed by a full 72 hours because Noem’s signature was missing, did the department give in. Too late. By then, it wasn’t just Texas that lay in ruins - it was trust. On July 11, Democratic members of Congress demanded in a letter, which is fully available to us, that FEMA Acting Director David Richardson disclose all internal decisions. The accusation: politicized control had "severely undermined" the agency’s ability to respond. The National Association of Emergency Managers also spoke in an internal bulletin of an "avoidable loss of control" that made emergency responders "look like spectators." Trump had made it clear at the beginning of his second term where the journey was headed: FEMA was to be "phased out." The market would take care of it. Responsibility would be handed over to the states - but without money. "It’s not Washington’s job to dry out the same river every year," the president had said. It was a sentence that sounded cynical. And was cynical. Because what appears to be technical failure was in truth an ideological experiment: the withdrawal of the state at the moment of greatest need. A laboratory for those who believe that care is inefficient and compassion too costly.



It is the voices of the people that make the unimaginable tangible. Mike Toomey, a painter from North Carolina, called. "They said I was number 675 in the queue." He hung up. "It was hopeless." His story is not unique. Even in the months before, after Hurricanes Helene and Milton, FEMA had, according to internal records, failed to answer nearly half of all emergency calls. But this time, it wasn’t an accident. No power outage. No flooded office. Just a lack of will. Jeffrey Schlegelmilch of Columbia University put it bluntly: "Put yourself in the shoes of someone who’s lost everything - and no one answers the phone." In reality, FEMA had lost more than just a system. It lost what once defined its legitimacy: trust. Presence. Responsibility. Now, Washington is discussing whether to close more regional FEMA offices - in the name of efficiency. An efficiency that has no answer for the feeling of being forgotten. An internal FEMA email from July 8 puts it clearly: "We have no go. No contract. No DHS statement. No response from Noem. We are not authorized to do anything." It is the sentence that remains - because it does nothing, because it says everything. But America wasn’t just deaf. It was deliberately deaf. And that is worse. Because in this week, in which children drowned, mothers searched for their sons, and people sifted through rubble, the country could have shown what it means to be there for one another. Instead, it chose to leave the line dead. Maybe it was economic. Maybe ideological. But it was certainly inhumane. And perhaps that is the most harrowing part: that America heard - and turned away anyway.
Your support helps us defend human rights and protect the environment – especially where others look away. Thank you.
Hauptsache es ist Geld für ICE, Detention Center etc da.
Gouverneur Abott betonte noch, welche großartige Arbei Noem leisten.
Tru** stellte sich hinter sue und sagte, sie macht einen großartige Job und Hilfen sind schnell und unbürokratisch auf den Weg gebracht worden.
Hören die sich selber mal zu?
Was muss noch passieren, damit die Bevölkerung aufsteht und sich richtig wehrt?
Anstatt es als „Gott gegeben“ hinzunehmen und „zu beten“.
Leute, bekommt endlich Eure hintern hoch.
Es sind Eure Familien die betroffen sind.
Und die nächste Naturkatastrophe kommt bestimmt.
Besser wird es nicht mit den Hilfen.
Im Gegenteil, es wird eingestampft.
Und durch die Medicaid Kürzungen bekommen die Geretteten nicht mal eine adequate Versorgung.
Oder diese treibt die Familien, due alles verloren haben, komplett in den Ruin.
Nicht nur das Blut ihres Hundes, sondern das vielen unschuldiger Menschen lebt an Noems Händen.
Wie kann sie noch in den Spiegel schauen?
Die schaut nur in den Spiegel um ihre „wunderschönen“ Lippen zu bestaunen und ihre „Prachtsmähne“ zurecht zu ziehen…!
Eine einzige Katastrophe….inklusive diese sadistische Noem…!