On July 29, 2025 Donald Trump spoke to journalists on the return flight from Scotland aboard Air Force One - and made a statement that matches the decades-long relationship between him and Jeffrey Epstein with the results of the investigations of the last weeks. In brief, almost casual words he explained that in the early 2000s Epstein had "stolen" young women from the spa of his estate in Mar-a-Lago to draw them into his own now notorious network. Among these young women, Trump said, was also Virginia Giuffre - that woman who later became one of the central accusers, first as Jane Doe 1, in the proceedings around Epstein and who died by suicide in April 2025. Trump’s statement matches almost one to one with the timelines and documents that we possess.
Trump described that he had repeatedly warned Epstein not to poach employees from Mar-a-Lago, whether they worked in the spa or not. When Epstein ignored this warning and again took women from the spa he ultimately barred him from the estate. In his words there is a mixture of indignation and an attempt at distancing: "He stole them," said Trump, and at the same time emphasized that Giuffre had made no complaints against him or Mar-a-Lago.
What is remarkable is that these statements match the timelines and documents that we possess. Over years we have been able to reconstruct from witness statements, court files and internal documents a picture that supports exactly this sequence: that Epstein deliberately searched in Mar-a-Lago for young women who later appeared in his circle. Trump’s words fit seamlessly into this mosaic - not as a surprising confession but as an open confirmation of what our investigations have long established.
These words feel like a glimpse into a repressed era and give the sober, often dry documents a painful authenticity. That Trump now himself in front of live microphones says that Epstein had "stolen" Virginia Giuffre from his spa makes the tragedy more tangible - a young woman whose fate has long become a symbol of the destructive pull of power, abuse and complicity. For the public this is first-hand confirmation - a sentence that unites everything that for years remained hidden in the shadows of the files.
Investigative journalism requires courage, conviction – and your support.

„Er hat sie gestohlen“
Was für eine menschenverachtende Aussage.
Abgeworben ja, aber nicht gestohlen.
Oder waren diese jungen Frauen sein „Eigentum“?
Gekauft auf irgendwelchen abscheulichen „Märkten“?
Denn das gibt es auch heute noch.
Junge oft Minderjährigen werden auf Parties der reichen Klientel vorgestellt.
Bekundet einer Interesse, wechseln ein paar tausend Dollar den Besitzer und eine Seele wird verschachert.
Oder es gibt „Vorabbestellungen“ und die Mädchen werden gezielt danach ausgesucht.
Es ist unglaublich furchtbar, dass die Täter sich eigentlich nie Verantwortung müssen.
Dieser ganze Fall ist ein Mysterium – Wir haben ich schätze über 95% aller Akten, du fällst vom Glauben ab, wenn Du das lesen würdest
Ihr bekommt aber auch alles😃
das müssen wir und vielen Dank