Miss Moscow, Marco, and the Maneuver – How Rubio Defused Trump’s Most Delicate Episode

It is one of those footnotes in history that ought to make a loud bang – but hardly anyone heard it. Buried in a congressional report, overseen by none other than Senator Marco Rubio, lie details of an encounter that carries serious explosive potential for both the then-businessman Donald Trump and today’s president: an allegedly awkward moment between Trump and a Russian beauty queen – Miss Moscow – at an event already permeated by intelligence interests at the time. But instead of bringing the scene to public light, something else happened: Rubio, chairman of the powerful Senate Intelligence Committee, quietly let it disappear – with the discretion of a show producer who knows exactly when the curtain should fall.

Scene: Moscow, 2013. Occasion: The Miss Universe pageant, hosted by Donald Trump. In a back room, according to later witness accounts and diplomatic notes, there was said to have been a sensitive exchange between Trump and a Russian contestant – observed by several people, including at least one Western security officer. The incident was never officially documented, but it appears in internal notes from a staffer that – after years of delay – ended up in a congressional report. That report, however, was not used by Rubio to provide clarity. On the contrary: the passage was – like a refrain that doesn’t fit the theme – subtly overwritten, buried beneath layers of footnotes. Coldplayed, one might say. The method is reminiscent of the eponymous band: a maximally harmonious tone that drowns everything out. No outrage, no revelation, no direct questions. Rubio, who once portrayed himself as a foreign policy hawk, apparently chose to shelve the file in this case. Why? The explanation seems obvious: The senator from Florida has long since become part of a GOP structure that identifies less with truth than with loyalty. And in that framework, Trump – Miss Moscow or not – is not seen as an embarrassment, but as a pillar of power.

But what if the report had landed in different hands? What if, for example, the Democratic committee chair had brought the episode to the public? What if the questions had been asked that have been lingering in the air ever since: Who was the woman? Who knew about it? And why would a man flirting with presidential ambitions travel to Moscow with such exposed vulnerabilities – just months before early contacts with Russian officials began via Flynn, Page, and others? That Marco Rubio did not ask these questions is no accident – it is political calculation. The report was his stage, Trump his future boss. And while America’s capital continues to shuffle through a reality-TV drama with a new twist every day, this particular chapter went unnoticed. A stroke of luck for Trump. A loss for the public. In Washington, a lot is in flux right now. And as the swamp reorders itself, the true scriptwriters behind the scenes begin to show. Some delete scenes before anyone sees them. Others applaud – and pretend nothing ever happened.

Investigative journalism requires courage, conviction – and your support.