Jeffrey Epstein and the Knowledge That Would Have Shaken America

There are moments when a single sentence is enough to bring down the illusion of stability in American politics. Such a sentence was spoken in 2016 - at least behind closed doors, between two brothers whose lives could hardly have been more different. Mark Epstein, the brother of the now infamous Jeffrey Epstein, still recalls a conversation that chills him to the bone. “If he said what he knew about the candidates, they would have to cancel the election,” he says. Jeffrey never revealed in detail what he knew - only that it would have been enough to shake the political foundation of the United States to its core. The candidates he spoke of were Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, both of whom had moved for years in Epstein’s social circle, both seen in photos at his side. But it is not only about pictures, but about what took place behind the scenes - a network of power, money, and secrets that, years after Epstein’s death, is once again becoming the focal point of political debate.

Podcaster Joe Rogan, long a Trump sympathizer, sees in the current escalation surrounding the Epstein complex a red line. “There’s a line in the sand,” he said on his show. “And this is one of those lines. Everyone had been talking for years about how Trump would drain the swamp, bring the truth to light. And then this case comes along - the hardest line of them all - and they are trying to tell us something different.” Rogan just shook his head, as if he could hardly believe how much had not been clarified, but only further obscured, since Epstein’s death. In Washington, meanwhile, there is nervousness. The Republicans have sent Congress into an early summer recess, apparently hoping that public outrage will subside by September. Rogan considers that a fatal mistake. “They believe that everyone will just move on by then. I think they are wrong. This feels like one of those few conspiracies that never go away - like JFK or whoever. It just hangs around.”

Mark Epstein’s words reinforce this perception. His brother, he says, was convinced that the truth about the 2016 candidates would not have survived politically. Jeffrey Epstein had “dirt on many people,” as Mark says, and in the end someone made sure he could never speak. Officially, it was a suicide in a high-security cell in Manhattan, but doubts about that have never gone away. “Someone wanted to silence him,” emphasizes Mark Epstein. Donald Trump himself seems eager to play down the episode from the past, telling journalists in the United Kingdom about his supposedly clear distancing. Epstein had eventually become “persona non grata” because he had poached staff from Mar-a-Lago - a justification that seems conspicuously harmless given the gravity of the allegations later brought against Epstein. While American politics reels amid this scandal, there is growing concern that the investigation will stall again. Rogan speaks of gaslighting, of a deliberate attempt to wear down the public until no one has the energy to ask questions anymore. But the mix of political elites, celebrity, and unspoken secrets is too explosive to simply disappear. Epstein’s sentence from 2016 hangs over history like a sword of Damocles: “If he said what he knew about the candidates, they would have to cancel the election.” It is the sentence that explains everything and yet clarifies nothing - the glimpse into a world in which power, fear, and silence are inextricably linked. For America, the bitter realization remains that some truths are so big that they are better buried than spoken aloud. And for the Epstein family, the question remains whether that truth will ever come to light.

Investigative journalism requires courage, conviction – and your support.