One Sentence, One Rage - How Kristi Noem Wants to Silence the Fear of ICE

It was a moment that cut through political rhetoric - cold, defensive, resolute. "Don't you dare ever say that again" - never dare to say such a thing again. With these words, Kristi Noem, Trump's Secretary of Homeland Security, responded to the question of a reporter whose audience is predominantly Latino and who said they feared deportations by ICE - because "a lot of people have been targeted based on their skin color." Noem’s gaze remained hard, her tone icy. What she delivered was not an answer - it was a rebuke. Not an engagement - but a rejection. In another time, in another country, such a remark might have sparked a discussion. A debate about structural discrimination, about racial profiling, about the responsibility of authorities in a multilingual, multicolored America. But not under Trump’s rule - and certainly not under a secretary who sees her office as a shield against criticism. Noem, who likes to present herself as the patriotic frontwoman of a new national sentiment, did not speak for the affected. She spoke against them - and for a government that prefers to reassure rather than illuminate.

But the numbers and reports are clear. For months, civil rights organizations, UN bodies, and investigative reporting by journalists have documented that people of color - and especially people of Latin American descent - are disproportionately affected by deportations, arrests, and checks. There are recordings in which ICE officers pull bus passengers aside solely based on their appearance. There are court records in which no offenses are documented, yet families were still torn apart. And there are thousands of voices - quiet, exhausted, shaken - all telling the same story: that skin color in the United States has once again become a reason for detention. But Noem turns that around. In her world, it is not the system that is questioned, but the questioner - and with them the entire critique. Those who point out racism become suspicious, not the racism itself. It is a pattern that runs through many areas of the new administration: the attack on reality. The reinterpretation of fear. The moral reversal in which those affected are no longer heard - but those who feel disturbed by their complaints.

What remains of Noem’s sentence is not only the harshness with which she spoke it. It is the message between the words: that in this America, one must no longer ask whether power is just - but only whether it functions without disruption. And that any doubt about it is already considered an insult - not to the victims, but to the order itself. But a sentence is not an end. And a rebuff is not an answer. The fear remains - not of ICE alone, but of a policy that wants to silence its critics. And with every attempt to forbid the word, the silence grows louder.

If independent, fact-based reporting matters to you, you can support our work directly. We do not run ads, we are not backed by corporations – we fund ourselves and rely on people who value what we do. Your contribution helps us pursue investigations, access court records, and sustain serious journalism. Thank you.