Chrupalla on the trash heap of diplomacy - and calls it politics

byRainer Hofmann

November 25, 2025

Tino Chrupalla has long lost any threshold of decency. As soon as Donald Trump presents his 28-point plan, the AfD leadership jumps on it like someone who has been waiting for a signal to finally say: "We were right." Only that the exact opposite is true. This plan does not show that the AfD understood anything at all - it only shows how far Chrupalla is willing to go to sell a complete capitulation of Ukraine as a diplomatic masterpiece. For him everything is so simple: Ukraine is supposed to cede territory. Period. In addition, a restricted access to the Black Sea - as if that were a generous gift and not the creeping economic and security suffocation of a country. Chrupalla talks about it as if it were an administrative reform. In his portrayal, even the most severe geopolitical self-sacrifice sounds like a technical process that can be settled with a signature.

He pretends that this outcome is the logical consequence of Western "mistakes", as if Russia and Putin were not the driving force of this war but Brussels. And although the United States blocked every serious European initiative for years, Chrupalla sells the current plan as a triumph of American reason. As if Washington had ever promoted anything that was truly safe for Kyiv. The United States constantly slowed things down in this question - and now he presents their course as a revelation. Then he brings Orbán into the picture - who calls the EU a "war mafia" - and quotes him as if that were some kind of indisputable insight. For Chrupalla, Orbán is the witness of truth, even though he has done nothing for years but dress up Putin's interests in Europe. But it is enough for Chrupalla that someone shouts "EU to blame!" loud enough. Content does not matter, as long as it fits his worldview.

It becomes even more grotesque when he mentions Trump. Trump claims Ukraine should "better not have started the war." A Russian attack is suddenly reinterpreted as a decision by Ukraine - and Chrupalla calls that "exaggerated." But he does not actually contradict it. Because this distortion is exactly what he needs politically: The victim has to be guilty so that the perpetrator appears as a negotiable partner. Merz is now supposed to "be careful" not to block the plan. According to Chrupalla's logic, the CDU leader would be responsible for a possible prolongation of the war. Not Putin. Not Trump. Not the demands for ceding Ukrainian territory. No - Merz. Chrupalla shifts responsibility so far until it lands where it benefits him. That Ukraine would be geopolitically mutilated by this plan does not interest him. The main thing is that he can point the finger at Berlin.

Europe has "failed", he says, even though the EU was the only one that even tried to find a course that guarantees security without sacrificing a country. While Washington stalled and Berlin hesitated, Brussels negotiated, supported, paid, stabilized. But Chrupalla needs the image of an incompetent Europe to create the appearance that the AfD is the only force that has the courage to recognize "real diplomacy." But what he calls "diplomacy" is nothing more than nodding through a list of demands that Moscow has been preparing for years. The AfD speaks of peace, but means submission. It speaks of diplomacy, but means that Ukraine should comply. This plan is not progress - it is the script of a forced retreat. And that is exactly why Chrupalla celebrates it: He himself has never shown a hint of empathy for the country that loses the most in this war. He adopts Putin's arguments, Trump's cynicism and Orbán's contempt for Europe - and sells it as smart world politics.

"Hollow and hollow flock together"

The 28 points show above all one thing: Anyone who celebrates them has nothing to do with peace. They are only interested in keeping Ukraine small, stabilizing Russia and weakening Europe. The AfD does that with frightening eagerness. And Chrupalla stands at the forefront - ready to push a country into the final abyss and then claim it is for its own good. It is almost logical that Chrupalla now appears on the cover of a magazine that would not be missed if it disappeared tomorrow. That this very paper sells him as a "peacemaker" surprises no one, because like attracts like, hollow down to the last pixel.

Updates – Kaizen News Brief

All current curated daily updates can be found in the Kaizen News Brief.

To the Kaizen News Brief In English
8 thoughts on “Chrupalla auf dem Müllhaufen der Diplomatie – und nennt es Politik”
  1. Kommt mir nur noch in den Sinn, dass der eigentlich ein leuchtendes Beispiel für eine leere Hülle ist. Aussen fix und innen nix, heisst es doch bei euch, oder nicht?

  2. Ich darf mir einfach nicht vorstellen, was los ist, wenn diese Partei etwas zu sagen hat. Wenn ich manchmal Kommentare lese unter Tagesschau/online, Monitor etc. (immer unmoderiert) schlägt einem so unglaublich viel Hass, Zerstörungswut und Gehässigkeit entgegen, dass ich das höchstens 5 Minuten aushalte.

    1. …da hast du recht, aber sind wir ehrlich, viel gegenwehr kommt da auch nicht, und die leute, die sich wirklich dagegenstellen, aufklären usw…die werden nicht grade viel unterstützt. man erwartet eine wende, will aber selbst zuschauer sein, ein grosses problem und wird so nicht funktionieren.

  3. AfD und Empathie passen absolut bicht zusammen.

    Schon von Anfang an waren sie Russland affin.
    Deren Parteimitglieder hielten noch direkt nach Kriegsbeginn intensive Kontakt mit der russischen Botschaft, machten Reisen nach Russland.

    Für Russland perfekt.
    Man muss nicht mühsam Agenten anwerben.
    Man hat doch die AfD und das BSW.
    Denn auch Sarah Wagenknecht hielt eine Rede, wie toll der 28 Punkte Plan ist und das sie (ihre Partei) das doch schon immer so gesehen haben.

    AfD und BSW haben keine Probleme ihr Land für Macht zu verraten.

    Leider gibt man ihnen viel zu oft im Fernsehen eine Bühne.
    Alleine dort keine AfD oder BSW Politiker einzuladen und sie Putins Propaganda in Monologen referieren zu lassen, würde schon viel bringen.
    Aber nein, das „traut man“ sich nicht.
    Man „muss“ doch doe politische Vielfalt wahren.😡

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *