A moment from Washington that raises questions.
It is the evening before Trump’s grand military parade. Washington feels tense, like it’s under glass. On the streets, the capital is preparing for June 14 – the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, Flag Day, and also the 79th birthday of President Donald Trump. Fighter jets rehearse their routes, soldiers march in formation. But in front of the Capitol stands a different kind of figure: quiet, motionless, alone.
An over-80-year-old U.S. veteran, gray-haired, stooped, but with a clear gaze. His sign reads: “Democracy is not a parade.” No shouting. No violence. Just a silent warning. Then the unthinkable happens: police move in. Not because he’s rioting. Not because he’s disturbing the peace. But because – according to the officers – he crossed a “security line.” The man is placed in handcuffs. And what the images show cuts deep:
They don’t even let him walk with his walker – even that final support is taken from him as they lead him away.
What remains is the image. And the question: what does the right to free speech still mean if even those who risked their lives for that right are now arrested for exercising it? The veterans who gathered that evening did not do so out of defiance. They did it out of concern. Concern for a democracy increasingly lost in martial symbolism. A democracy that sees criticism as disruption – and parades as patriotism.
Yet it was precisely this kind of quiet protest that has always shaped America. In 1932, veterans camped out in front of the Capitol to demand their bonuses. In the 1970s, veterans protested the Vietnam War – not because they misunderstood it, but because they had lived it. And veterans like this man on June 13, 2025, remind us: those who have defended democracy also have the right to question it.
Today, “security” is often used to justify repression. But who protects the quiet voice? Who protects the right to dissent in silence? Who protects the fundamental right not to cheer along? The scene from June 13, 2025 will remain. Not because of the parade that would take place the next day. But because of the man who stood there in silence – and was taken away. Because of a state that appears more afraid of an old soldier than of its own moral emptiness.
Silence cannot be arrested. And dignity even less so.
Was, wenn er ohne den Gehwagen nicht hätte laufen können? Was würden sie mit einem machen, der Gehstützen braucht? Oder im Rollstuhl sitzt? Auch die Hände hinterm Rücken mit Kabelbindern fesseln?
gute frage; bei denen weisst du es wirklich nicht mehr, was in den köpfen vorgeht, einfach schlimm