American politics increasingly resembles a theater in which not only the roles but also the rules are being rewritten. What once lurked in the dark corners of ideological discourse is now stepping into the glaring light of the public stage. The confrontation between Donald Trump and Elon Musk reveals not just personal vanity, but also lays out the blueprint for a much deeper power struggle - a movement that calls itself Dark MAGA and seeks nothing less than the transformation of democracy into a technocratic autocracy.
At the center of this movement is a new alliance of billionaire technocrats, anti-democratic ideologues, and power-hungry politicians. Elon Musk, the richest man in the world and owner of one of the most powerful communication networks, declared back in 2020 that government is simply the largest corporation. This logic still shapes his thinking today - so why not run the United States like a company? With a CEO, not a president. Efficiency instead of participation. Control instead of compromise.
The intellectual foundation for this idea comes from Curtis Yarvin, one of the most influential theorists of the so-called neoreactionary movement. Yarvin openly advocates for the abolition of democratic institutions. He dreams of a state that is not elected but ruled - from above, rationally, without resistance. His ideas have long circulated in the circles around Peter Thiel, Steve Bannon - and JD Vance.
JD Vance, Trump’s vice president, has become a projection screen. To Trump, he is a loyal adjutant. To Musk, a potential successor. To Yarvin, a vehicle. The idea that Vance could take over the presidency as America’s “fresh CEO” was openly floated through a post liked by Musk. The post called for nothing less than Trump’s removal from office - to install Vance in his place. Trump reacted with fury. He threatened to cancel all government contracts with Musk’s companies, called Musk insane, and spoke of treason within his own ranks. And Vance? He dodged. He called the idea of his appointment “crazy,” affirmed his loyalty to the president, and tried to fill the emerging vacuum with platitudes. But the rift is there. And it runs deeper than personal loyalty.
Dark MAGA is not just a meme, not just an internet phenomenon. It is the radical escalation of disappointment in democratic processes. A movement that doesn’t want to reform the political establishment but replace it. Its followers no longer believe in parliaments or checks and balances. They believe in speed, in leadership, in top-down order. This current meets a political moment that favors it. Traditional institutions are weakened. The Supreme Court has lost authority, Congress is paralyzed, the media landscape fragmented. In this vacuum, the idea flourishes that a new, technologically legitimized elite must take the helm. Not elected, but appointed. Not controlled, but admired.
The political landscape of the United States stands on the brink of a tectonic shift. It is no longer a fight between Republicans and Democrats, between left and right - it is a struggle between democracy and its dismantling. Between a public that still believes in participation, and an elite that is already working to make it obsolete. Dark MAGA is the name for this transition. A cipher for the fantasies of power harbored by those who believe they can do it better - because they own more, think faster, act more efficiently. It is an attack on the idea of equality, on the weakness that is part of democracy, on compromise as the foundation of civil society.
Whether this strategy will succeed is still uncertain. But it is no longer hidden. It is visible, organized, financed - and ready. The coming months may determine whether Dark MAGA remains a dark thought experiment - or becomes the new code of power.
English 
German 
