Donald Trump’s reconstruction of the White House is no longer just a building project. It is a reflection of his architecture of power - built from concrete, vanity, and dependency. The demolition of the East Wing to make room for a private ballroom would hardly be worth mentioning if not for the circle of America’s most powerful corporations and billionaires behind the donations. On the official list of contributors are names that form the foundation of the U.S. economy - and now also the foundation of Trump’s prestige project. Amazon, Apple, Google, and Microsoft are among them, as well as Meta Platforms, HP, Caterpillar, Palantir Technologies, Coinbase, Ripple, Micron Technology, NextEra Energy, T-Mobile, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Hard Rock International, Altria Group, Reynolds American, and the Comcast Corporation, the parent company of NBC and MSNBC. Added to this are railway giants like Union Pacific Railroad, energy and tobacco lobbies, tech and data firms - a cross-section of the power elite that has influenced political decisions for decades.

But the list does not end with corporations. The families and individuals who co-financed the project read like a chapter from the handbook of American influence: the Adelson Family Foundation, the Betty Wold Johnson Foundation, the Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation, the Lutnick Family, Charles and Marissa Cascarilla, Edward and Shari Glazer, oil magnate Harold Hamm, meat industry billionaire Benjamin Leon Jr., investor Stefan E. Brodie, hedge fund giant Stephen A. Schwarzmann, politician Kelly Loeffler and her husband Jeff Sprecher, Paolo Tiramani, Konstantin Sokolov, and the crypto brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. Even J. Pepe and Emilia Fanjul, known from Florida’s sugar empires, are among the donors.

The question is not why Trump accepts their money - but why they give it. Comcast refused to comment, Amazon stayed silent, and Google indirectly confirmed a $22 million donation in a court document. MSNBC anchor Stephanie Ruhle said that no company writes checks “out of pure goodwill.” Rachel Maddow warned that such payments are an attack on public integrity: “Anyone who helps an authoritarian president build a monument to himself endangers democracy - not symbolically, but in reality.” NBC News tried to keep its distance, reporting objectively on the demolition, mentioning its own parent company in a single clause. But the dilemma was visible: reporters covering a project that their owners helped finance. Chuck Todd called it a credibility problem - not because he suspected manipulation, but because the mere appearance of dependency destroys trust.
The Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos, defended Trump’s project in an editorial praising “strong leaders” who “do not tolerate stagnation.” Only after public criticism did the editorial team add a note stating that Bezos himself was on the donor list - a belated admission of guilt that could no longer repair the damage. Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s press secretary, praised the article on Truth Social as “the first reasonable voice from the mainstream press.” The same paper that once warned against the erosion of democratic norms had suddenly become the witness of an architecture of vanity. And while cameras filmed the ruins of the East Wing, a network of interests grew behind the scenes: Google, dependent on political favor after years of hearings on market power and data protection; Comcast, planning new mergers; Lockheed Martin, profiting from Trump’s defense budgets; NextEra Energy, seeking federal subsidies; Palantir, hunting for government contracts; and Meta, struggling to survive in a new media landscape. They are the same actors who shape public opinion, influence regulation - and are now quite literally building into the walls of power.
The new ballroom will soon be completed. Marble, crystal, gilded doors. Perhaps one day there will be a reception for those who made it possible - Apple beside Lockheed, Comcast beside Google, Bezos under the chandeliers. The president will be celebrated, the cameras will roll, and somewhere in a corner a small plaque will hang: Donations made possible by America’s most successful companies. Then the line between journalism, power, and money will no longer blur. It will become part of the architecture itself, begging for corruption.
Investigative journalism requires courage, conviction – and your support.
Please also strengthen our journalistic fight against right-wing populism and human rights violations. We do not want to finance ourselves through a paywall so that everyone can read our research – regardless of income or origin. Thank you very much!

Wenn jedes Unternehmen im niedrigen zweistelligen Millionenbereich spendet – kommen da nicht deutlich mehr als 350 Millionen zustande?
…ja, da bleibt noch viel über für schöne details, die trump entzücken dürften