It is a sentence that shatters everything one would expect from an entrepreneur who belongs to the most powerful figures in the tech world: Peter Thiel, billionaire, Trump supporter, co-founder of Palantir, declares in a series of lectures that the regulation of artificial intelligence will lead to the "rise of the Antichrist." Not a subordinate clause, not a rhetorical slip - but the deliberate connection of a global debate about technology with religious end-time rhetoric. Thiel speculates that government interventions in AI systems will pave the way for a "peace and safety" regime, an authoritarian order that will engulf the nations of the world and establish a "one-world government" structure. In this interpretation, regulation is no longer understood as a political debate but as the gateway of an apocalyptic power - the Antichrist.
Peter Thiel stages the regulation of artificial intelligence as the work of the Antichrist - and thus himself ends up in a paradoxical role. Because in the logic of his own narrative it is he who embodies the perfect Antichrist: an entrepreneur who demonizes state control while at the same time creating with Palantir a system that penetrates deeper into the intimacy of society than any democratic authority ever could. Thiel inverts the world by turning the call for regulation into an apocalypse - and at the same time selling an infrastructure of total surveillance.
What Thiel is doing here is not merely polemics but a deliberate rewriting of reality. While in Brussels, Berlin and Washington commissions wrestle with how AI can be regulated in terms of transparency, data protection and security, Thiel transforms the debate into a religious drama. Whoever demands limits for Palantir, OpenAI or other systems is in his logic not a democrat but a forerunner of evil.
The dimension of these statements becomes particularly clear when one looks at Palantir itself. The company has for years been a partner of intelligence services, militaries and police authorities - also in Germany. Here Palantir software is used in several federal states, including by the police in Hesse, to link data streams from a wide variety of sources. For a long time there has been criticism that this violates fundamental rights, that security authorities gain new instruments of power through Palantir's technology that are hardly democratically controlled.
Particularly explosive: In Germany Palantir officially operates through Palantir Technologies GmbH based in Munich. In parallel, networks such as Rockbridge exist which - as we have already documented through our own research - function as interfaces between the tech industry, politics and security authorities.
https://kaizen-blog.org/en/die-marionetten-des-silicon-valley-wie-peter-thiel-und-rockbridge-amerikas-gesundheitspolitik-unterwandern/
https://kaizen-blog.org/en/die-schattenakten-palantir-der-unsichtbare-staat-im-staat/
Under this umbrella contacts were mediated and doors were opened that are hardly known in public perception. Precisely this covert approach illustrates how strongly Palantir is trying to secure its footprint in Europe while at the same time interior ministries praise the systems as efficiency gains. That Thiel now rants against regulation in apocalyptic imagery also casts a light on these German connections - on a network of companies and organizations that operate in the shadows but have long since penetrated deeply into security structures.
The real danger lies not in the eccentricity of a multibillionaire but in the effect. Thiel positions himself as an intellectual pioneer of a movement that mixes religious language, apocalyptic imagery and libertarian ideology - and in doing so shifts the political landscape. If the regulation of AI is branded as the "work of the Antichrist," then the real questions - questions about algorithmic discrimination, about monopolization, about surveillance - disappear behind a wall of religious rhetoric.
In the United States this fits seamlessly into the chorus of Christian-nationalist currents that make technology policy a question of faith. In Germany it meets a debate that is fragile anyway. Data protection advocates are already warning about the consequences of Palantir's use by police authorities, while interior ministers are pushing for efficiency and modernization. In parallel, networks such as Rockbridge operate, mediating contacts between the security apparatus and tech companies. That the co-founder himself argues in apocalyptic categories shows how deep the ideological divide runs: here the call for democratic control, there the demonization of regulation.
Thiel's words are therefore more than a provocation. They are an instrument of power. Whoever drags the debate about the regulation of AI into the realm of the religious narrows the space for sober political discussion. It is the same strategy that made Palantir big: to turn technology into an instrument of fate, control into a question of belief. And so after Thiel's lectures what remains is less the memory of an eccentric billionaire than the realization that here speaks a man whose words unfold political impact. The Antichrist that Thiel invokes is not simply a metaphor. It is an instrument of power, a rhetorical sword to fend off democratic control and to preserve the logic of a company that has long since itself become the symbol of the authoritarian grip of technology.
Investigative journalism requires courage, conviction – and your support.
Please support our journalistic fight against right-wing populism and human rights violations. We do not want to finance our work through a paywall, so that everyone can read our investigations – regardless of income or background.
English 
German 
