In the annals of democratic degeneracy, the apotheosis of Andrew Bailey will be recorded as a turning point - that fatal moment when the last bastions of constitutional integrity capitulated before the altars of populist demagoguery. His transmutation from obscure Missouri lawyer to Deputy Director of the FBI transcends the boundaries of individual corruption; it rather manifests the systematic evisceration of American institutions by those who had sworn to protect them. Born in 1981, Bailey went through the conventional stations of provincial ambition: the University of Missouri on an Army ROTC scholarship, two deployments in the Mesopotamian theater as an armored officer, decorated with two Bronze Stars - the quintessential genesis of an American patriot. Yet between the hagiographic lines of his vita crystallizes a darker truth: that of a man whose military merits function as rhetorical aegis while he simultaneously demolishes the constitutional foundations he once swore a sacred oath to defend.
The symbiosis with the autocrat: Bailey’s Trump devotion
The relationship between Bailey and Donald Trump transcends the boundaries of conventional political alliance - it constitutes a symbiotic fusion of authoritarian ambitions. When Bailey undertook his pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago in late fall 2024 to antechamber before the self-proclaimed sovereign, the true nature of his aspirations was revealed. The audience, orchestrated as ritualized gesture of submission, ended in a spectacular fiasco: Trump, the self-styled connoisseur of character deficiency, found Bailey insufficient for the FBI directorship - he lacked the necessary “presence in the room,” that indefinable aura of brutal dominance Trump so deeply cherishes.
But Bailey, in his servile persistence, transformed this humiliation into opportunity. His subsequent campaign of legal interventions in Trump’s favor reached grotesque dimensions. When Trump was convicted in New York of 34 felonies, Bailey initiated an unprecedented judicial farce: he sued the State of New York before the Supreme Court, arguing that the prosecution of a presidential candidate constituted “election interference” and violated the rights of Missouri’s voters. This absurd legal theory - that one state could control the prosecution of another - was branded by even conservative jurists as “constitutional insanity.” Bailey’s obsession culminated in the public propagation of the lie that the 2020 election had been “stolen” - a blasphemy against the democratic order he as Missouri’s chief legal officer should have defended. He transformed the Attorney General’s office into a propaganda machine for Trump’s martyr narrative, squandered taxpayer money on hopeless lawsuits, and degraded his office to an appendix of the Trump organization.
The Epstein enigma: The dialectic of cover-up
Bailey’s appointment as Deputy Director of the FBI comes at a moment of maximal institutional turbulence - the Epstein debacle that plunged the Trump administration into its most existential crisis. The constellation is of Shakespearean irony: Bailey, the servile loyalist, is installed as crisis manager after his designated partner Dan Bongino - himself a first-rate conspiracy theorist - nearly submitted his resignation in a spectacular conflict with Attorney General Pam Bondi over the handling of the Epstein files. The crisis was orchestrated in large part by Laura Loomer, that toxic MAGA influencer who functions as Trump’s unofficial whisperer. Loomer, whose extremism is considered borderline even within the radicalized circles of Trumpism, ignited a firestorm when she publicly accused Bondi of incompetence and announced Bongino’s threatened resignation on X: “Dan Bongino is seriously thinking about RESIGNING,” she wrote in characteristic capitalization. Her demand for a special prosecutor and Bondi’s dismissal transformed an internal disagreement into a public execution.
Bongino, who for years propagated the theory that Epstein had been murdered, had to publicly admit after reviewing the files: “He killed himself. I saw the entire file.” This reversal triggered an uprising within the MAGA base, who felt betrayed by those who had sold them conspiracies as truth for years. The administration, caught between the expectations of its radicalized base and the reality of non-existent “client lists,” imploded in internecine warfare.

Into this chaos Bailey is injected as “stabilizer” - a desperate attempt to restore authority after Loomer and her cohorts had demolished the administration’s credibility. Bailey, whose appointment as Co-Deputy Director represents an unprecedented construction - never before had two people shared this position - functions as institutional buffer between the discredited Bongino and the enraged MAGA base. The irony is of biting perfidy: an Attorney General who used manipulated Project Veritas videos as evidence is now supposed to safeguard the integrity of an institution he for years denounced as part of the “deep state.” His installation represents not stability but capitulation before the mob - a position that exists only because Loomer and her digital stormtroopers forced the administration to its knees. Yet above all looms Loomer, the digital fury with millions of followers, whose tweets now carry more weight than internal memoranda. It was she who exposed Bondi’s lies, who publicized Bongino’s resignation intentions, and who unmasked Bailey’s appointment for what it is: a desperate attempt to contain the crisis she unleashed. For Loomer, Bailey is little more than a marginal figure, a creature of Bondi - but she knows she could destroy him with a single tweet. Thus his appointment becomes the symbol of institutional collapse: a powerless buffer, installed to weather the escalation between Bondi, Bongino, and Loomer, in a system that no longer knows order.
The Grand Inquisitor of Missouri: The hunt for the vulnerable
Bailey’s tenure as Missouri Attorney General reads like a compendium of state-sanctioned cruelty. His obsession with transgender youth reached pathological dimensions - a witch hunt whose vehemence recalls the darkest epochs of American paranoia. Based on falsified videos from Project Veritas - an organization whose name has become synonymous with journalistic fraud - Bailey constructed a regime of persecution of Kafkaesque perfidy. He demanded unredacted medical records of underage patients, a demand of such juridical obscenity that even conservative judges dismissed it as unconstitutional. When Washington University refused to release these most intimate medical data, Bailey sued them - and lost. When Children’s Mercy Hospital rejected his demands, he sued them - and lost again. Yet these legal defeats did not prevent him from continuing his campaign, driven by an ideological rage that transcended any legal boundary.
The perverse apotheosis of his argument manifested itself in his lawsuit against abortion medication: Missouri, Bailey claimed, was losing tax revenues due to reduced teenage pregnancies. This dystopian calculation - the reduction of female bodies to fiscal production units - reveals a worldview of such monstrosity that even Orwell would have paled.
An office in chaos
Bailey’s administrative failure reached epic dimensions. A third of the positions in his office remained vacant - an emptiness that manifested itself in exploding processing times and missed appeal deadlines. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, no liberal bastion but a conservative institution of the Midwest, established its own column: “The Bailey Tally” - an ongoing chronicle of his abuses of office, conflicts of interest, and extremist escapades. Even Republican legislators in Missouri - normally disciplined soldiers of the party line - publicly voiced their consternation at Bailey’s chaotic administration. This criticism from within his own ranks, in the normally hermetically sealed world of Republican power politics, speaks volumes about the scale of his dysfunctionality.
The bloodstain Marcellus Williams: Judicial murder as raison d’état
Nothing in Bailey’s dark chronicle of office reaches the moral abyss of his role in the case of Marcellus Williams. Despite DNA evidence suggesting Williams’ innocence, despite the prosecution’s admission of racist jury selection and contamination of evidence, Bailey with sadistic precision blocked an agreement that would have commuted Williams’ death sentence to life imprisonment.
On September 24, 2024, Williams was executed - a judicial murder whose blood clings to Bailey’s hands with the permanence of a Lady Macbeth stain. This execution of a possibly innocent man marks not only an individual moral bankruptcy but the necrosis of the legal system itself when it is corrupted by ideologues like Bailey.
The alliance of the apocalyptic: Bailey and Bongino
The installation of Bailey as Co-Deputy Director alongside Dan Bongino constitutes a pairing of apocalyptic symbolism. Bongino - a man who denounced the FBI as “irredeemably corrupt,” who claimed the agency staged January 6, who was banned from YouTube for Covid disinformation - finds in Bailey his perfect accomplice for institutional demolition.
When Trump was convicted, Bongino openly threatened: “The irony for the communist scum liberals is that the cold civil war they are pushing will end very badly for them. They are not ready for what comes next.” What came next was his appointment as FBI Deputy Director - and Bailey as his partner in this orgy of institutional destruction. Christopher O’Leary, a former senior FBI official, articulated the collective horror of the agency: “We now have two conspiracy theorists and election deniers at the top of our most important law enforcement and intelligence agency.” This statement, in its sober factuality, contains the entire tragedy: the guardians have become plunderers.
Corruption as modus operandi
Bailey’s ethical transgressions constitute a compendium of corruption. When PACs affiliated with companies in ongoing proceedings generously donated to his campaign, he had to recuse himself from the case - but only after the payments became public. His clandestine rendezvous with defendants in his own proceedings led to one of his deputies losing his law license. Bailey himself escaped only through legal tricks from being deposed under oath about these contacts.

The brazenness of his corruption reached its zenith when he attempted to intervene in Trump’s New York criminal trial - an unprecedented incursion of a state attorney general into the sovereignty of another state. This legal transgression, motivated by servile Trump devotion, degraded the office of Attorney General into an instrument of personal political vendetta.
The twilight of the republic
What Bailey and Bongino represent transcends individual failure - they are avatars of a deeper necrosis that has afflicted the American experiment. Their installation at the top of the FBI marks not only an institutional nadir but possibly a point of no return for American constitutionalism. Bailey may have worn his uniform with pride, may have fought in the Mesopotamian sands for abstract ideals. But his true battle he wages against the Constitution itself, against the vulnerable, against empirical reality. He is no hero but a traitor - not only to the ideals he swore to defend but to the fundamental humanity that constitutes every civilized society.
As Bailey and Bongino take up their new offices in the J. Edgar Hoover Building, as they take into their hands the machinery of state surveillance, one can only contemplate with horror what they intend to do with this power. History will not remember Andrew Bailey as the decorated veteran he once was, but as one of the architects of the American collapse - a man who helped raze the last bastion against autocratic darkness. In this pandemonium of power, in this twilight of democratic norms, Bailey stands as a monument of human depravity - a memento mori for a republic that devoured itself in the flames of its own paranoia. And while the ashes of American institutions blow through the corridors of power, Andrew Bailey’s name will forever be associated with their downfall - a modern Nero who did not play the lyre while Rome burned, but actively stoked the flames. If you as reader believe you have already witnessed every form of democratic abyss in the United States, then Andrew Bailey leads you into a heightening of unimaginable magnitude. We know this man.
Investigative journalism requires courage, conviction – and your support.
Das erste Mal, dass ich aus einem Beitrag aussteige – die Menge der mir unbekannten Fremdwörter erschlägt mich 😉
Sorry, doch dieser Mensch ist in seiner Groteske kaum zu übertreffen. Ich beschreibe Menschen so, wie sie mir im Moment und der Recherche erscheinen – und manchmal entstehen daraus solche Texte. So bin ich eben. Aber ganz schlicht gesagt: Er ist ein erbärmlicher Schuft.
Bleib, wie du bist, ich hab’s jetzt, neugierig geworden, doch gelesen. Es ist so apokalyptisch, dass meine einzige Hoffnung ist, dass wir, Deutschland und Europa, noch rechtzeitig lernen aus diesem Desaster.
Ich freue mich über die Sprache, was gibt es denn schöneres, als die gute Sprache. Ich hatte kein Problem und wäre froh, mehr würden wieder auf Niveau schreiben. Man kann Wörter auch nachschauen.
Das ist harter Tobak, unglaublich wie viele Jahre dieser Mann mit Allem durchkam und durchkommt.
Wie blind waren die Leute und Justitia (abgesehen von den Klagen, die er verlor)?
Diese blinded Ergebenheit, das ist bicht nur Gehirnwäsche, in seinem Kopf prangt nur noch ein großes D und T.
Furchtbar, dass diese zwei Gestalten das FBI nun leiten.
Naja, eigentlich leidet Trump, sie führen aus.
Die Demokratie in den USA ist gestorben.
Für lange Zeit fürchte ich.
Umkehrbar? Das wird die Zeit zeigen.