Paranoia Trump declares election victories a deception!
Donald Trump reacts to the clear election victory of Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger not with analysis, but with insinuation. A fifteen percent margin is not accepted by him as a political verdict, but reinterpreted as fraud. In this logic, whoever wins has not persuaded, but cheated. Substantively, it remains thin. Trump speaks of bad political decisions without naming a single one. Instead, he reaches for a familiar trigger word and broadly claims it is about “transgender for all.” A statement with no connection to reality, Trump law as usual. It is the old method of reducing complex elections to propaganda meant to generate fear. The fact that Spanberger won in a regular, verified electoral process is irrelevant. Democracy is not accepted here as an outcome, but treated as an insinuated fraud. Whoever does not fit cannot be legitimate. This is how an election result becomes an enemy image and political defeat becomes a conspiracy.
Emails from the Caribbean – what the new Epstein documents show about Musk
Newly released documents from the US Department of Justice paint a clear picture of years of friendly correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein and Elon Musk. Between 2012 and 2014, the two repeatedly exchanged emails, coordinated travel plans and looked for opportunities to meet in Florida, in the Caribbean or on Epstein’s private island. In one message, Epstein explicitly invited Musk to visit him on the island and to feel free to bring friends along. Musk responded positively and said he would try to arrange it. Particularly explosive is the timing. The contacts took place years after the first publicly known abuse allegations against Epstein. Nevertheless, Musk signaled interest in visits to Little Saint James and in one email asked about the wildest night on the island. Further messages show conversations about travel, private meetings and even medications such as Nuvigil. A calendar entry from December 2014 carries the title that Musk was to come to the island on December 6. Whether the visit actually took place remains open.
At the same time, Epstein and his circle organized a visit to SpaceX. Appointments, invitations and later thank you messages document a meeting at the company headquarters in California, including a tour. Musk’s brother Kimbal was also in regular contact with Epstein and wrote after shared meetings about a pleasant time. Publicly, Musk later stated that he had declined invitations to Epstein’s island. The now released emails tell a different story. They show no clear no, but repeated postponements, cancellations due to illness or work and continued exchange. Even at the end of 2013, Musk again asked about a suitable time for a visit. Shortly thereafter, Epstein canceled. The documents prove no crime, but they refute the portrayal of complete distance. They show closeness, interest and years of contact at a time when Epstein’s past was already well known.
Journalist arrested, constitution questioned
Independent journalist Georgia Fort is back at liberty after her arrest in the morning. She had been reporting in Minnesota on a protest against ICE in a church and was taken into custody by police while carrying out her journalistic work. After her release, Fort posed a simple, uncomfortable question: whether there is still a constitution in this country is the decisive question. No dramatization, no outburst, but a sober statement after hours in police custody. A journalist is led away because she documents what is happening. A house of worship becomes a site of state intervention. Public oversight is declared a disruption, journalistic work a problem. The incident ends without charges, but not without effect. Those who look closely themselves come into focus. But we know that ourselves all too well.
Arrested, released, charged – the Don Lemon case
Former CNN journalist Don Lemon is back at liberty after his arrest in Los Angeles. A judge ordered his release without bail, while at the same time a federal indictment remains in place. Lemon and three other individuals are accused of having disrupted a worship service at the Cities Church in St. Paul during a protest against ICE, a church whose pastor is an ICE officer. The charges are conspiracy and interference with the religious freedom of worshippers. The basis consists primarily of videos that Lemon recorded and published as an independent journalist. He himself emphasized after the hearing that he has reported for 30 years and will not stop. According to the Department of Justice, the arrest was carried out on direct orders from Attorney General Pam Bondi. Critics see this as an open attack on press freedom. The mayor of Los Angeles also spoke of a massive infringement of constitutionally protected rights. For now, the case does not end in prison, but in court – with a warning to all who look, who report on site.
“This is dangerous” – how history disappears under Trump
In Philadelphia, something was said in court that usually disappears behind file notes. Federal Judge Cynthia Rufe called it dangerous and alarming when the Department of Justice claims the government can itself decide which parts of American history are displayed in public places. The trigger is the removal of an exhibition on the history of slavery at the former President’s House near Independence Hall. Workers arrived with crowbars and removed panels, texts and images that told the story of nine enslaved people whose existence had long been erased from public memory. The city had worked on the exhibition and contributed funds, much of it had only been scientifically documented in recent decades. The materials disappeared onto a pickup truck, then into storage, their condition unclear. In court, a government attorney stated that in the end the state itself decides which message is conveyed.
The judge immediately interrupted and made clear that history cannot be swapped out at will. Knowledge cannot be undone simply because political majorities change. The removal follows a presidential directive intended to bring museums, parks and memorial sites into line with a new policy. Critics see this not as an administrative act, but as an intrusion into historical truth. The names of the enslaved people remain carved in stone, their stories have been removed. Attorneys for the city reject the idea that state authorities have free rein to reorder the past.
A representative of the supporters spoke of a claim to power that becomes frightening the moment it is openly asserted in a courtroom. Cynthia Rufe intends to inspect the site and the storage facility herself and to decide quickly. She ordered that nothing further may be changed until then. On site, people lay flowers and leave notes with simple sentences. That slavery was real is written there. That is exactly what is now at issue in court.
Power grid under attack – how Russia’s strikes increase nuclear risk
In Vienna, the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency convened a special session because Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure are noticeably increasing the risk of a nuclear accident. Damaged substations sever the external power supply on which even operating reactors depend for cooling. Emergency generators can help, but each additional outage shortens safety margins. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi warned that strikes on switchyards undermine safety and must be avoided.
Ukraine operates four nuclear power plants, three under Kyiv’s control. The largest, Zaporizhzhia, has been occupied by Russian troops since 2022. Added to this is the site of Chernobyl, whose history shows how quickly technology and politics can collide. An ongoing IAEA mission is inspecting ten critical substations while the attacks continue. Diplomats spoke of systematic destruction that affects millions of people in winter and at the same time lowers the threshold to nuclear risk. The meeting has no binding effect, but is intended to increase pressure. Kyiv demands that the danger to Europe’s security be clearly named. At the same time, the Ukrainian side pointed to efforts by Donald Trump to stop the shelling, without the conditions being clear so far. As long as power grids are under fire, cooling remains a matter of minutes – and safety a matter of luck.
The victims rightly oppose drawing a line
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein have spoken out jointly and sharply condemned the incomplete release of the files by the Department of Justice. What is sold as transparency once again primarily affects them, the statement says. Names and identifying information of victims surfaced, while perpetrators and helpers remain protected by obscurity. This is intolerable and a renewed violation. The survivors make clear that they must not be the ones exposed, scrutinized and burdened again while others remain in the dark. It is specifically noted that to this day it is not openly known who enabled and safeguarded Epstein’s system. Hundreds of women testified, yet the full truth is still missing. The Department of Justice cannot claim its work is finished as long as every document required by law has not been released. Complete disclosure and accountability for all involved are demanded. The statement is explicitly directed at political responsibility and announces that they will not relent. It is not about parties, but about truth. The message is clear: the case is not over.
