![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kaizen-blog.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/batch_image-kaizen-blog.leak224.webp?ssl=1\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\nOn Truth Social, he now writes: \"Does anybody really believe that this 'Election' was honest. How could the Polls be so wrong???\" Some early voting \"dumps\" had supposedly been so large that winning was impossible, no matter how many more people showed up to vote. In the original English, he calls these votes \"dumps,\" as though somebody had unloaded a pile of trash outside a polling place in the middle of the night. What he's talking about are votes cast by citizens who voted earlier than others. A crime that apparently only happens when the wrong people get up early. Then comes the line that carries the entire post: \"It's all about the machines, which are far more important than the voter!\" Signed \"President DJT,\" as though he were afraid somebody might mistake him for someone reasonable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rarely has a politician turned the very meaning of democracy so thoroughly upside down. An election rests on the promise that people make the decisions and machines merely count the votes. Trump reverses that relationship. In his world, the voter barely matters, and the machine decides. The president whose party has just been voted out by millions of Americans reduces those very people to supporting characters. You could read that as an inadvertent confession. For a man who mainly knows voters as a cheering backdrop, it's hardly surprising that he thinks some machine somewhere must have cheered the wrong way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vice President JD Vance also questioned polls that had predicted a decisive Democratic victory after his party's disastrous election. There had been a genuine sense of optimism on their team, and their voters had been showing up, he wrote on X last week. The fact that people on the other side were also showing up, and in even greater numbers, apparently hadn't registered with anyone on the team. Optimism is a wonderful feeling. It doesn't make up for a lack of votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vice President JD Vance also questioned polls that had predicted a decisive Democratic victory after his party's disastrous election. There had been a genuine sense of optimism on their team, and their voters had been showing up, he wrote on X last week. The fact that people on the other side were also showing up, and in even greater numbers, apparently hadn't registered with anyone on the team. Optimism is a wonderful feeling. It doesn't make up for a lack of votes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Perhaps Trump's expectations simply had something to do with the people around him, who would rather please him than contradict him. A White House source reported that his now-departed chief of staff, Susie Wiles, had promised victory right up to the end. As recently as September, she had reportedly told others that Republicans would win a landslide in the midterms. Last week, Trump announced that Stephen Miller would replace Wiles as his top aide. The bearer of good news is out, and the enforcer is in. The election results remain exactly the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At court, the king hears what he wants to hear. Outside, the voters are being counted, and eventually the numbers come through the door. Then there are two choices. You can question your own policies. Or you can question the machine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump w\u00e4hlt, wie so oft, die Maschine. Damit kehrt er zu seinen alten Methoden zur\u00fcck und verbreitet erneut weitreichende Behauptungen \u00fcber Wahlbetrug, f\u00fcr die er keinen Beleg vorlegt. Die Frage nach dem Warum stellt er nicht. Sie h\u00e4tte ihn zu den W\u00e4hlern gef\u00fchrt, und die sind ihm offenbar nicht wichtig genug.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The bingo square is checked. The next ones probably won't be far behind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n