TRUMP: \"No. No. It's a mother speaking badly against Amy Acton. You don't know anything.\"<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\nDonna Arthur lost custody of her children. She stayed married to Cledith Arthur until his death in 2004. Back in 2020, she had already publicly claimed that her daughter had lied about the sexual abuse. Now she's sitting in front of a camera again, this time serving a Republican campaign. The records from 1978 are available. Apparently, that wasn't enough to convince the people behind the ad to leave her out of it. Trump openly praised the ad. On Thursday, he had already called it \"very powerful.\" He said the press was trying to make it look bad precisely because it was so good. He asked why anyone would pass up an ad like that. A day later, he stood before reporters and claimed he knew nothing about a stepfather. Yet he had already been confronted with Acton's past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Donna Arthur was a smart woman, Trump concluded. More than that: The fact that a mother was publicly speaking out against her own daughter struck him as an especially convincing argument. The man who, as president, oversees the United States Department of Justice apparently wanted nothing to do with the underlying court records. Monica Alba wasn't about to let him get away with that. The reporter asked Trump about the allegations of sexual violence. \"Do the sexual abuse allegations mean nothing to you?\" she wanted to know. She reminded him how serious they were.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\"Quiet!\" Trump snapped at her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When another reporter pointed out to the president that Acton's stepfather had been indicted for rape, he immediately cut her off. \"No, no.\" He then repeated his defense of the ad. The mother was speaking badly about Acton. To him, the matter was very simple. That very simplicity is horrifying. A criminal case opened in 1978, decades of estrangement between a mother and daughter, and a documented childhood history all disappear behind a single face in a campaign ad. Trump didn't need to read a court record to pass judgment on the mother. When reporters tried to explain the background to him, he shut down their questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ramaswamy also defended his ad on Friday. He claimed his opponents were lying about it. The ad had absolutely nothing to do with childhood sexual abuse, he insisted. In fact, the campaign ad never explicitly mentions the rape allegations from that time. But its main witness had already publicly disputed Acton's account. The claim that this history has absolutely nothing to do with the ad requires considerable disregard for the facts. Even Ohio's Republican governor, Mike DeWine, who had supported Ramaswamy, called for the ad to be taken down. Vice President JD Vance, like Trump, continued to defend it. Ramaswamy's campaign plans to spend millions of dollars airing it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On November 3, voters in Ohio will decide who becomes their next governor. Until then, Donna Arthur can continue speaking out publicly against her daughter. Cledith Arthur never had to answer for the allegations in court because he fled. Almost 50 years later, Amy Acton still has to deal with the consequences of that childhood, while the president of the United States praises her mother.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sometimes political cruelty doesn't need a big speech. A single word is enough. In Washington on Friday, that word was: \"Quiet!\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n