![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kaizen-blog.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/batch_kaizenlettersirpa301-26.webp?resize=635%2C900&ssl=1\")
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\nBut this raises an old question in a new form. Praise has always drawn its value from the fact that the person offering it could also have chosen not to. Someone who praises another person voluntarily reveals something about themselves. Someone who sends a prewritten sentence reveals nothing because they contributed nothing. The software has already completed the approval before the sender has even approved. A default setting is not an opinion. It is the absence of the need to have one. What appears here as a personal message is in reality the same text multiplied across countless devices. The more people send it, the less each individual actually says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The fact that government employees of all people appear to be among the first users gives the episode its own character. They are paid by the state, and the state now supplies them with the words they are supposed to send upward to its leadership. What is remarkable is not the technology itself but what it suggests about expectations toward one\u2019s own people. Admiration that no one has to formulate anymore is no longer admiration at all but an act without an author. And unlike a feeling, a function can be executed with a single tap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n