{"id":36676,"date":"2026-05-20T17:40:24","date_gmt":"2026-05-20T16:40:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kaizen-blog.org\/?p=36676"},"modified":"2026-05-20T17:50:24","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T16:50:24","slug":"zwei-polizisten-gegen-den-korruptionsfonds-von-trump-und-blanche","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kaizen-blog.org\/en\/zwei-polizisten-gegen-den-korruptionsfonds-von-trump-und-blanche\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Police Officers Against Trump and Blanche's Corruption Fund"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are moments when the balance of power shifts. On Wednesday, May 20, 2026, it was not politicians, constitutional scholars, or the major voices of Washington that delivered the sharpest legal response to the Trump administration's Fund Against Political Weaponization. It was two police officers. More specifically, the two men who, on January 6, 2021, used their own bodies to prevent a crowd from fully taking control of the Capitol. Daniel Hodges of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department and former Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn filed suit on Wednesday against Donald Trump, current Attorney General Todd Blanche, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Their goal is nothing less than the complete blocking of the $1.776 billion fund created by the Trump administration to compensate so called victims of politically motivated prosecution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read also our article: Trump: Corruption Now Has a Name, an Address, and the Seal of the Department of Justice<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The language of the lawsuit carries a level of clarity rarely seen in legal filings. The fund, it states, is an illegal slush fund through which Trump would finance the rioters and paramilitary groups that carried out violence in his name. Elsewhere, the complaint delivers the sentence that may define this day: the creation of this fund is the most brazen act of presidential corruption of this century. These are not politicians writing those words. These are the men who were beaten, kicked, and struck with flagpoles while defending the Capitol. Men who know exactly what the breath of the people now potentially receiving money from this fund felt like.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

More than one hundred police officers were injured on January 6, 2021. Some were struck in the head with baseball bats, flagpoles, and metal pipes. One officer lost consciousness after rioters forced her to the ground with a metal barricade. More than 1,600 individuals were later charged with crimes connected to January 6. During his second term, Trump effectively erased nearly all of those cases through pardons and sentence reductions in one sweeping act of executive clemency. The men who stormed the Capitol are free. The men who defended the Capitol are now in court trying to prevent those same attackers from also being financially rewarded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Read also our article: In Remembrance and as a Warning \u2013 The Voices and the Death \u2013 What Police Officers Really Experienced on January 6<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The background of the fund is now widely known. Out of Trump's $10 billion settlement with the Internal Revenue Service in the case involving leaked tax returns emerged a structure that is nearly without precedent in every respect. $1.776 billion in taxpayer money was designated to compensate those who see themselves as victims of a politicized justice system. The payouts are to be determined by a five member commission personally appointed by current Attorney General Todd Blanche. Blanche, Donald Trump's personal attorney before entering office, defended the fund before the Senate Appropriations Committee one day before the lawsuit was filed. When asked whether individuals who attacked police officers on January 6, 2021 could also receive payments, he refused to rule it out. That refusal was the breaking point for Hodges and Dunn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Daniel Hodges, Harry Dune<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The lawsuit itself rests on a precise constitutional argument. The Trump administration, it says, exceeded its legal authority by creating the fund without congressional approval. It is the exact point that Republican Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana raised on Tuesday. Cassidy said it was like someone suing himself and then reaching a settlement with himself that the rest of the country would be forced to pay for. The Hodges and Dunn lawsuit now translates that political accusation into legal language. It says this: a president cannot unilaterally redistribute taxpayer money in order to reward political allies or violent individuals who stormed the Capitol in his name.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brendan Ballou, one of the attorneys representing the two officers, previously served as a federal prosecutor at the Department of Justice and worked on January 6 related cases there. That is no coincidence either. Men who understand the system from the inside are now taking that same system to court after seeing their work dismantled. Trump erased the cases that Ballou and his colleagues spent years building. Ballou now stands alongside the people those efforts were meant to protect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harry Dunn is now running for a seat in Congress in Maryland. He no longer wears his uniform, but he still carries his story with him. Daniel Hodges carries his as well. Video footage from January 6 shows a rioter tearing Hodges' mask from his face while he was pinned against a door inside a tunnel entrance, fighting to maintain control over a single access point into the building. Both men testified before Congress. Both spoke openly about what they experienced that day. Now they are no longer speaking in hearing rooms, but before a federal court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spokespeople for the Department of Justice and the Treasury Department did not respond to inquiries on Wednesday. Perhaps because it is difficult to find an answer when the men who defended their country with their bodies call a slush fund for the attackers the most brazen act of presidential corruption of this century. Or perhaps because there is simply nothing to say. If the law that once protected the walls of the Capitol must now be turned against the government itself, then the situation is so clear that every additional word would only dilute the truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is an image that stays with you. Two police officers against a president. Two men against a structure requiring an entire country to pay so that yesterday's attackers can become tomorrow's beneficiaries. The lawsuit will make its way through the courts, and that will take time, and no one can say how it will end. One thing is certain: on this Wednesday in May 2026, two police officers held a mirror up to the United States that politics itself no longer dares to look into. They are looking into it on its behalf. And what they see there has a name they chose themselves: one of the largest corruption scandals in America.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n