{"id":28119,"date":"2026-02-04T19:59:12","date_gmt":"2026-02-04T18:59:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kaizen-blog.org\/?p=28119"},"modified":"2026-02-04T20:10:19","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T19:10:19","slug":"gespraeche-unter-beschuss-abu-dhabi-bombennaechte-und-die-grenzen-der-vernunft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kaizen-blog.org\/en\/gespraeche-unter-beschuss-abu-dhabi-bombennaechte-und-die-grenzen-der-vernunft\/","title":{"rendered":"Talks Under Fire \u2013 Abu Dhabi, Nights of Bombs, and the Limits of Reason"},"content":{"rendered":"

In Abu Dhabi, representatives of Russia and Ukraine have once again sat down at the same table, accompanied by the United States, while at the same time people in Ukraine were being buried under rubble, power plants were burning, and markets were turning into death traps. Two days of talks are scheduled, moderated by Washington, but the very first day of negotiations was already overshadowed by massive Russian attacks that put any hope for rapid progress into perspective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

The first day of the second round of Ukrainian-Russian peace talks under U.S. mediation has come to an end in Abu Dhabi. Nothing was publicly disclosed about any progress achieved or the lack thereof. On the following day, working groups are to continue their discussions at the same location. The question also arises to what extent these talks still make sense or whether they rather serve Putin as a means to gain time. For us personally, these talks have reached the end of reason.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Delegations from Moscow and Kyiv took part in the talks, supported by U.S. special envoys and high-ranking political emissaries from the White House environment. From the Ukrainian perspective, the talks were described as serious and factual, with a focus on concrete steps and implementable solutions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, it remained unclear how much substance actually lies behind these formulations while the war continues unabated. Even as the talks were underway, Russian attacks struck civilian targets. In eastern Ukraine, several people were killed and others injured in a cluster munition attack on a market. In other regions, civilians died in residential areas, including elderly people whose homes were hit. The port city of Odesa was also attacked again, residential buildings were damaged, and people were rescued from the rubble. These attacks did not occur on the margins of the talks, but at their very center.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

Unfortunately, this is not the first time Russia has acted in this way, and the world has meanwhile become so accustomed and numbed to it that such acts barely register as news anymore.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Particularly grave is the continued destruction of Ukraine\u2019s energy infrastructure. During one of the coldest winter phases in years, power plants were attacked with missiles and drones, including facilities that supply hundreds of thousands of people with heat. In Kyiv, hundreds of repair teams worked around the clock while tens of thousands of apartments remained without heating. Energy sector workers are described as exhausted, replacements had to be organized while new attacks loomed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

Russia fired approximately 350 to 500 drones as well as around 65 missiles at Ukraine during the night. Europe must move from passive observation to active action. It is long overdue to leave behind the role of mere spectators. Sanctions must not only be imposed or announced \u2013 they must be consistently implemented and effectively monitored. We report repeatedly on how fragile, incomplete, and in part unprofessional these sanction mechanisms are being overseen.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This escalation stands in striking contrast to the diplomatic signals of recent weeks. Not long ago, there had been talk of a temporary suspension of attacks on the power grid. The interpretation of this pledge, however, remained vague. While Washington stated that Moscow had adhered to a brief pause, the Ukrainian side pointed out that new attacks had resumed after only a few days. The impression solidified that agreements were being interpreted differently or used tactically.<\/p>\n\n\n\n