{"id":26863,"date":"2026-01-22T15:27:12","date_gmt":"2026-01-22T14:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kaizen-blog.org\/?p=26863"},"modified":"2026-01-22T15:34:27","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T14:34:27","slug":"board-of-peace-und-keiner-weiss-so-recht-wofuer-selenskyj-verlaesst-davos-ohne-unterschrift-brisante-gaza-dokumente-nach-recherchen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kaizen-blog.org\/en\/board-of-peace-und-keiner-weiss-so-recht-wofuer-selenskyj-verlaesst-davos-ohne-unterschrift-brisante-gaza-dokumente-nach-recherchen\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cBoard of Peace\u201d \u2013 and no one really knows what it is for \u2013 Zelensky leaves Davos without a signature \u2013 explosive Gaza documents revealed through investigations"},"content":{"rendered":"

Donald Trump unveiled his latest creation in Davos: a \u201cBoard of Peace,\u201d a peace council that, according to him, is meant to one day render the United Nations obsolete. Thirty five countries have already signed, sixty have been invited. But what this council is actually supposed to do remains largely unclear. The event at the World Economic Forum felt like a mix of state visit and sales show. Presidents, prime ministers and senior diplomats from more than a dozen countries came to be present as Trump launched his project onto the world stage. Originally, the idea had been part of his twenty point plan for a ceasefire in Gaza, approved by the UN Security Council. In the meantime, it has become something much bigger \u2013 or at least something meant to sound bigger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Ali Shaath, head of the US backed committee of Palestinian technocrats for Gaza, announced during the ceremony that the Rafah crossing to Egypt would open next week. The border is a \u201clifeline\u201d for the people of Gaza, he said. The crossing has been closed for a long time, most Palestinians in Gaza are trapped, and those who fled the war cannot return. After the ceasefire, Israel was obligated to open the border. But Israel has resisted doing so as long as Hamas does not return the remains of the last hostage in Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n

This document, obtained through research and marked as unclassified, is in our possession. It outlines in detail the establishment of a future controlled Palestinian residential and administrative zone. The title \u201cMunicipality\u201d obscures its actual character: it is not about municipal self-government in the classical sense, but about the administrative restructuring of a population under comprehensive security supervision. The selection of residents is to be strictly controlled. Priority is given to Palestinians from the areas of Shaboura and Rafah \u2014 but only under clearly defined criteria. Preferred are intact families and certain professional groups such as teachers, medical personnel, administrative staff, and merchants. All residents are to be subjected to a security screening, explicitly aimed at excluding weapons or alleged Hamas connections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Freedom of movement is formally assured, but remains tied to constant controls. Access to the area \u2013 as well as leaving it \u2013 is permitted only after security checks. In parallel, the document provides for the full biometric registration of all residents. The basis is to be Palestinian ID numbers issued in coordination with COGAT. This describes a system in which civilian administration and military control are effectively interwoven. Politically particularly sensitive is the section on local governance. Initially, a non elected, temporary directorate is to be installed. Democratic elections are mentioned only as a later option \u2013 without a timeline, without guarantees. The body is to organize essential services such as water, electricity and sewage, while the question of cost sharing by the population is explicitly left open.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Property issues are also addressed \u2013 but from an alarming perspective. Since the land is defined as public property, private rights are to be reviewed only retroactively, including possible compensation mechanisms. The fact that even this point is marked as \u201csubject to discussion\u201d shows how secondary property and return rights are treated. Projects are to be financed through external donors. Direct handling through Palestinian institutions is explicitly excluded. Instead, an overarching supervisory model is envisaged, since existing funds of the Palestinian Authority cannot be used. Here too, it becomes clear: sovereignty is not intended, but administration under reservation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Iran was also discussed. \u201cIran wants to talk, and we will talk,\u201d Trump said, claiming credit for last year\u2019s air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as his idea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n